(USA) Seemed good, but too much foreign language and in metric
Child Growth Tracking at Google Play market analyse
Estimation application downloads and cost
Description
Infant Growth Patterns is one of the most comprehensive applications for growth tracking among boys and girls ages 0-19 based on international percentiles of the World Health Organization.****** (Not applicable for premature babies) ******Growth is not only a result of nutrition but inherited factors. Ethnicity can influence a childs growth patterns, so some countries have their own Growth Pattern Curves. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Pattern Curves are the most frequently used and considered the global standard.This application will allow you to add one or more children and easily control their height, weight, head circumference, body mass index and weight ratio for height.In addition, with graphs of percentile curves you can detect trends in their development to anticipate possible problems in their growth.The charts used in this application are based on the standards proposed by the WHO (World Health Organization).** 2.3.1- Updating of libraries- Bug fixes- Improved backup method
Reviews
I'd would love it more if can export direct to cloud drive
Easy to use
Very usefull app
The % chart is clear and easy to read, the best of many apps I've tried. Entering data is harder than it needs to be, having to flip through dates instead of pick on calendar. being able to see the line I'm entering data on would be nice. The height line, for example, is covered by my keyboard. Easy to use, but others are easier/faster.
fast and easy .
The developers of this app don't seem to understand what percentiles mean. Labeling the WHO 50th percentile value as "ideal" is both medically inaccurate and unnecessarily concerning to parents. At best, you could label a range as "typical" (e.g. 5th to 95th percentile). The app also flags any measurements outside of 15/85% as abnormal, which isn't right by itself and isn't even consistent with the WHO recommended cutoffs (2/98%). Also some weird English translations (perimeter vs. circumference) and it's awkward to use with inches/pounds (when you go to edit a measurement the value is in kg/cm even if you entered it in lbs/in).
